Suggestion Box

In the UK, there is already the concept of a minimum wage. It is there, in law, expressed as an hourly rate.

This minimum wage is something which has already been accepted as “the smallest amount that somebody can live on”. That’s why it is called “minimum”. The concept of a minimum wage is a done deal, it’s been in law for twenty years.

Why, then, do our furlough schemes pay people only a fraction of that?

Surely, if the minimum is the minimum, then it should be the minimum?

written for Weekly Prompts Weekly Challenge of 24 October 2020, Suggestion Box.

18 comments

  1. “Furlough” sir, is unemployment? If so, I can suggest one justification. If unemployment were to pay more than, or the same as, “minimum” there would be no incentive for unemployed people to go back to work when able and the market was in hire mode. That was evident in the U.S. during the pandemic. A waiter or farm laborer would be daft to go to work for $600/week when unemployment insurance paid $601. In practice, some would, and it is understandable, elect to stay home watching “The Real Husbands of Harpsburg Harbor” on television at $500 than go back to work stocking shelves in the grocery at $600. Goodness, one would be expected to shower, dress, and exert oneself stocking shelves. I’m not willing to launch into a tirade, but family generations and large communities are known where this is true, unemployment and entitlements preferred over labor for sustenance. It’s a tacky problem. Were you and I to abandon WordPress, devote our attentions to conjuring a solid and accepted solution, we could ourselves live quite handsomely on our share of the Nobel Prize in Economics. Certainly for a while. Then, I suppose, accustomed to a life of ease, we could ourselves apply for unemployment benefits.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Well, it seems so obvious doesn’t it being written in ink and all. yet, dare I say this is not the first time the written word has been skimmed past. Perhaps it is too much trouble for our paid law keepers to be forcibly imposed. They are busy are they not? Doing all kinds of sneaky think to get their backers agendas met. Hmmm i sound jaded…..I guess that’s because I am.
    Hmmm, did I answer the question??

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I think here in the US, minimum wage is up to the vendor, no matter what any figure is put out by the government. Congress seems to forget that as our representatives, they have a livable income with guaranteed security and perks while their constituents have no such terms.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s