Category: Returning to Paid Work

My job hunt has not been very successful. An example happened about a month ago. It was a lecturer role. Now, I’ve never taught in my life, although I do have plenty of experience of software development, so I’d hope that that would be useful when you have a bunch of people specifically looking to get into IT.

I was encouraged by the job advert. It specifically stated that it was fine if you didn’t have teaching experience, so long as you had substantial industry experience. Exactly what I wanted to hear. The advert went on to say that, if you weren’t already a teacher, you’d be sent on some crash course. Fine.

So I applied for the role and I was encouraged because they offered an interview. I mean, they said that applications from non-teachers were welcome, but all the same, if you are a trained teacher, that must be an advantage.

So I was pleasantly surprised that they offered an interview. However, my joy was short-lived when I read what the structure of the interview would be. Or, of one aspect of it. Have any of you heard of a micro-teach? I hadn’t, despite all my IT experience. I was actually quite miffed that these people had said “teaching experience not required”, when it transpired that it was, very much so. Of course, I didn’t say anything other than to say thank you, but I didn’t want to go any further. From my perspective, the goal once I’d realised that the job was unsuitable was just to spend as little time as possible on it, instead looking at vacncies which might be suitable. I had said on the application form that I was disabled, so maybe when they offered the interview, they had some quota to fulfil? But really, I’m not going to take the time and trouble to even turn up, if all I am is a makeweight.

I bet the person they eventually hired was already a teacher.

It’s interesting, I was speaking to an agent this morning about a role, and they said the fatal: “your CV looks really good. Can you rewrite it?” (Spot the contradiction!) And I’m just left thinking “noooooo”.

This is a CV that  led to working with a number of London banks. Plus, I’ve invested quite a bit of money into it, having it rewritten a few years ago by a professional CV writer. I’m supposed to forget that in favour of a comment from somebody I just met.

In particular I’m very careful to try and keep it to two pages, not on a whim, but because that’s roughly somebody’s attention span. Sad but true. The CV writer’s advice was also to “keep it to the last five years” – in fact I go back over 15 years, just because the roles (I think) were so prestigious, people are impressed when they see who the clients have been. Of course, I have to be incredibly brief in what I say about each role (fortunately one of them lasted 10 years, but within that role, I obviously accomplished a lot) because space is at such a premium.

Bearing in mind that I’ve been dealing with agents for many years, this is something I get from time-to-time. I mean, if you hear it every time you sent your CV off somewhere, then, fair enough, there’s probably something wrong with the CV, but if every agent asks you to rewrite the CV to highlight such-and-such, where such-and-such is different each time, and also a feature of this particular role… What the agent wants is something which is bespoke for every role you apply for, so it kinda negates the advantage of maintaining a CV in the first place. And as we get older, a CV inevitably throws up choices of what to say and what to leave out, so when an agent wants us to rewrite our CV, it is basically somebody telling us that we have poor judgement. I’m sure many people are very successful in what they do, and can demonstrate many years of sound judgement.

The role itself is for a government agency. I happened to mention that I had once worked for the government. “I didn’t see that on your CV”. No, because it was 1989-94. 25 years ago. Let’s be practical here. How detailed do you want a CV to be? I wouldn’t mind but if someone was interested in what I was doing 25 years ago, I keep a fully detailed employment history online, on one of the jobs boards, which goes back right to the start, and quote that link in the CV.

The icing on the cake was that, because I don’t have the exact skills that they’re looking for, they said up-front that they’d only pay the minimum rate on offer, until I’d successfully “retrained”. Forget that I’ve got oodles of experience doing something very similar, and would most probably be able to add value on Day #1 – that’s not worth anything to them. It was interesting too that they said this up front – if I’d have been hiring, that might well have been reflected in any offer made to a successful candidate, but I wouldn’t have said anything directly to them, certainly ot at this stage. I mean, I’m quite lucky in that I’m not particularly looking for big bucks nowadays, but the conversation left me feeling unconvinced that the client acknowledged that I had any relevant experience at all. I can accept that there might be some financial penalty for not being exactly what the clients are looking for, but I can’t help but feel that something would be going to waste if the previous 25 years were regarded as worthless. If I wanted my previous experience to be irrelevant, there are  jobs that come up every day in Salisbury which would be a far easier commute.

It makes me smile a bit because, just as I am constraining my search to the Salisbury area, they too are governed by geography. I know from experience that there are not many IT roles around here, I therefore assume that the converse is true – there aren’t a lot of people locally looking for IT work. Especially when the role is essentially civil service and therefore poorly paid (the salary on offer happens to be what I was earning in 1995, the exact same number, not even including inflation, so the role wouldn’t have been attractive to me unless I were constrained as I am). So just as I’m trying to be flexible in looking at jobs that are not quite 100% matches, I think they’re going to have to be flexible too, whether looking at me or the next person, or run the risk of not finding anybody.

Overall, I think, a pity because I am at a stage in life where working in the client’s area would be more attractive than earning lots of money. I should be exactly the kind of person they’re looking for.

Oh god, I’ve just realised that, since the stroke, I am now unemployable!

Prior to the stroke, I did well enough to sell my services to clients up in London. I was well-paid, and was never out of work.

Since the stroke, I’m far less keen on travelling, and in the 6+ months that I’ve been looking locally, I’ve hardly seen any jobs which are even vaguely appropriate.

I was optimistic, therefore, when an IT Lecturer job came up at the local college. I mean, I’ve no experience of teaching save for mentoring junior colleagues, but I figured that I had nothing to lose – my CV is an accurate reflection of what I’ve done, so it was up to the college to decide whether they were appropriate or not.

I was happier still this morning, when I got an email inviting me for interview. I accepted, but never really got the chance to look through all the attachments until this evening. It turns out that they want me to prepare something for the interview which they call a microteach. I’m guessing that’s some kind of presentation, but I’ve realised that I have no clue what to pitch at a 17yo. How much do they already know? How deep do I go? The term “micro-teach” is a foreign language, basically, and I have no clue how to go about planning a whole 90-minute session (which is, presumably, the CFE-equivalent of a lecture).

So I’m left knowing that I can’t let my application progress. I’ve got 25 years’ experience in IT, but micro-Teach tells me that I’m totally unsuited to any form of teaching. And, given that I’ve seen so very few jobs so far, I don’t think I’ll be employable again unless/until I’m able to travel back up to London again.