Green

If you detect a political slant to this blog, I must admit to being a member of the Green Party. This pre-dates my stroke slightly (by a couple of months), but is really quite recent in terms of the length of time I have been interested in politics. I never really found a party that was a good fit, but the Greens have been the best fit for a few years now.

I’ve always leaned slightly to the left, I suppose, and while early on I supported the (British) Labour Party, they are wedded to our current electoral system. Not only do I think it needs to be changed, but I think the issue is second only in importance to the environment. The Greeens say that too, plus they have the right idea on the environment. So anybody who can tick my top two boxes, I will support.

One area where I diverge from the Greens, however, is that they are very pro-EU, where I am not. I don’t think that the EU is particularly representative, and I think we need a representative democracy as a foundation, even before we start building policies on top. The EU isn’t that, and has no intention of becoming that. So I’ll pass. Frankly, Westminster isn’t that either, but let’s fight one battle at a time. If I wanted to be mischievous, I might ask why Greens don’t think the same way. Even if they said there were things wrong, but that on balance we are better off in, then it would be a start. But no … (Incidentally my view is a very left-wing Labour view, so maybe I am closer to them than I think?)

The Brexit issue is only a single issue, though, so hopefully we can agree to disagree on that one issue, and concentrate on all the things we do agree on. I mean, sure it is a big issue, but the environment is bigger.

But I’ll try to keep things on the blog logical, not ideological – I had to be very rational on account of my working life designing software (although my wife may disagree!) so I’m hoping it won’t be a problem here.

I suppose it is helpful to support a party with a name which is known the world over, I think pretty much all of us must have a Greeen Party. Even if they differ slightly, the general thrust will be the same. So international readers will know immediately whereabouts on the spectrum that I sit.

Author: Mister Bump UK

Formerly Stroke Survivor UK. Designed/developed IT systems for banks, but had a stroke in 2016, aged 48. Returned to developing from home, plus do some voluntary work. Married, with a grown-up, left-home daughter.

3 thoughts on “Green”

  1. Reblogged this on Stroke Survivor and commented:

    Yay, it is Friday again, and Fandango has just published his Friday Flashback post. The idea is that he picks a post from this day in a previous year, to give newer readers a better insight into what does and doesn’t make him tick.

    I have always liked that idea, so shall also post my own reminiscence. As much as anything, it reminds me of where I was, where I am now, and how far I have come. Hopefully, you will find it entertaining along the way.


    One thing which hasn’t changed much over the years is my enjoyment of current affairs. And, ny extension, of politics, since so much of current affairs is politics. In fact over the years I learned to keep my mouth shut, for that very reason. As I am older, and as I blog anonymously, I’m beyond caring so I write it anyway. What’s more, I sometimes find people who agree with me! Well, once or twice!

    I mentioned last week that I just hit my third blogiversary, and in the early days of the blog I felt that I needed to explain my political slant (to my imaginary audience!). It was not meant to be a flag-waving post, just this is how it is. We each need to come to our own conclusions and, if yours differ from mine, so be it.

    I am sure(?) you’d like to know whether I am still in the Green Party, and the answer is no. In the original post, I use the phrase agree to differ about Brexit. I had hoped that we could disagree on that one issue, but nevertheless stay broadly in line with each other, otherwise. I was wrong. As time went by, it became increasingly clear to me that they wanted to ignore the result of the 2016 referendum.

    To put it simply, I don’t think you can argue for better representation on the one hand (which they did, and which I fully support), then on the other, say you are going to ignore the result of ballots when they don’t go your way. Especially when a referendum gives an outcome on a single, specific issue, rather than choosing a delegate who approximates to our views on a broad spread of issues. We should have more referendums, if you ask me. But I bet we won’t!

    So, I let my membership lapse, just let it run out naturally. I don’t think my principles changed one bit, but I think I saw a side of them which made me very uneasy. Good luck to them in what they now do, but they can get on and do it without my support. I do say in the original post that I’ve never found any one party to be a consistently good fit for my beliefs and that line, at least, is still absolutely true.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.